Veiser v armstrong 1984 ok 61 18 688 p2d 796 802 however the doctrine applies only to the specific jurisdictional issue decided moreover dismissal for want of jurisdiction does not prevent filing a new lawsuit on the same cause of action because the matter had not been resolved on the merits gottsch v. See veiser v armstrong 688 p2d 796 799 n 6 okla 1984 in a conflict of law analysis matters of procedure are governed by the law of the forum citing northern pac ry co v babcock 154 us 190 194 1894 cf restatement second of conflict of laws 122 1971 a court usually applies its own local law rules prescribing . 618 so 2d 1278 1993 nina frances peters armstrong v stanley james armstrong no 92 ca 0130 supreme court of mississippi may 13 1993 1279 susan m guerieri guierieri mcreynolds southaven for appellant. Kane 852 p2d 717 722 n 23 okla1993 veiser v armstrong 688 p2d 796 800 nn 9 11 okla1984 collateral estoppel however only binds those who were parties to the first proceeding or their privies wilson 852 p2d at 722 n 23 none of the plaintiffs in this case unlike the plaintiffs in ruyle took part in the occ proceedings . A summary and case brief of united states v armstrong 517 us 456 1996 including the facts issue rule of law holding and reasoning key terms and concurrences and dissents
How it works:
1. Register a Free 1 month Trial Account.
2. Download as many books as you like ( Personal use )
3. No Commitment. Cancel anytime.
4. Join Over 100.000 Happy Readers.
5. That's it. What you waiting for? Sign Up and Get Your Books.